The Declaration of Rights of Neutral Nations

The Procellian Prime Minister, in à public statement, addressed the criticism from Quetzal. "This law only binds a neutral nation. A nonneutral nation, such as Tepetlan, would only be required to recognise the rights of a neutral nation. Right now we are the only permanently neutral nation on the planet. Unless Tepetlan plans to call themselves neutral and still fight in foreign wars, their criticism comes from a misunderstanding of the document."

(Ooc: The document divides nations into two types, neutral and antagonist. A neutral nation is bound by all provisions. An antagonist nation is only required to recognize the rights of a neutral nation. So your country would only be banned from attacking a neutral nation, or blocking it's trade.

For example Kauzka has signed the document. Kauzka can still declare war and do everything they could before, except they can not stop a neutral party, such as Procellia, from providing humanitarian aid and trade.

A nation can also be neutral on a case by case basis. So Kauzka can be an antagonist in one war, but declare neutrality in another war.)

Sent from my 831C using Tapatalk